<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WhatleyDude: A Discussion on Business Blogging, Social Media &amp; Awesomeness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zachbraiker.com/2008/11/whatleydude-a-discussion-on-business-blogging-social-media-awesomeness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zachbraiker.com/2008/11/whatleydude-a-discussion-on-business-blogging-social-media-awesomeness/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:41:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Uii</title>
		<link>http://zachbraiker.com/2008/11/whatleydude-a-discussion-on-business-blogging-social-media-awesomeness/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Uii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quiverandquill.com/2008/11/whatleydude-a-discussion-on-business-blogging-social-media-awesomeness/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Great interview...actually I&#039;ve been working on a few company blogs in my recent freelance misadventures, so it&#039;s nice to know that we share a lot of the same perspectives. Case in point, the whole &quot;numbers game&quot; -- it&#039;s really not at all useful to measure success entirely by traffic, or uniques, or what have you. Conversation, though it leads to more impressionistic that quantitative measurements, is I think a far better indicator of a good blog. There&#039;s also a great tool -- you&#039;ve probably already seen it, tho -- at &lt;a href=&quot;http://technorati.com/search?advanced&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;technorati&lt;/a&gt; that can search for external &quot;reactions&quot; to a blog. What better measurement of success exists than the acknowledgment, good or bad, of one&#039;s peers?

Oh, and by the way, Spinvox is a great service, and a great complement to pdas like the iphone and advanced voicemail providers -- I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gotvmail.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gotvmail&lt;/a&gt;, for example -- so I definitely appreciate the perspective here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview&#8230;actually I&#8217;ve been working on a few company blogs in my recent freelance misadventures, so it&#8217;s nice to know that we share a lot of the same perspectives. Case in point, the whole &#8220;numbers game&#8221; &#8212; it&#8217;s really not at all useful to measure success entirely by traffic, or uniques, or what have you. Conversation, though it leads to more impressionistic that quantitative measurements, is I think a far better indicator of a good blog. There&#8217;s also a great tool &#8212; you&#8217;ve probably already seen it, tho &#8212; at <a href="http://technorati.com/search?advanced" rel="nofollow">technorati</a> that can search for external &#8220;reactions&#8221; to a blog. What better measurement of success exists than the acknowledgment, good or bad, of one&#8217;s peers?</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way, Spinvox is a great service, and a great complement to pdas like the iphone and advanced voicemail providers &#8212; I use <a href="http://www.gotvmail.com" rel="nofollow">gotvmail</a>, for example &#8212; so I definitely appreciate the perspective here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky</title>
		<link>http://zachbraiker.com/2008/11/whatleydude-a-discussion-on-business-blogging-social-media-awesomeness/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quiverandquill.com/2008/11/whatleydude-a-discussion-on-business-blogging-social-media-awesomeness/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed reading that.!  Thanks.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed reading that.!  Thanks.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
